Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The trueness for the different assays was compared on samples of 100%andd 0.29% MON 810 to check the performance of methods at the limits of the dynamic range.
Similar(59)
Based on the results from the MMSE, our results suggest that the AQ may be superior to objective cognitive measures in detecting longitudinal change when compared on sample sizes required to detect a treatment effect.
Therefore, the CPU time required for the different descriptors is here compared on one sample from each class in the Kylberg dataset using the optimized parameters listed in Table 4.
The MBCT + TAU and TAU conditions will be compared on baseline sample characteristics to ensure that all possible meaningful characteristics were evenly distributed across the conditions.
The two dating methods can be compared on common duricrust samples.
We experimentally design a set of individual classifiers, each of which corresponds to a distinct representation type of context considered in the WSD literature, and then the discussed combination strategies are tested and compared on English lexical samples of Senseval-2 and Senseval-3.
The CV between different runs (performed on different days) was much lower for sera collected on day 140 compared to samples collected on day 28.
However, to date, these two approaches have not been compared on the same sample set.
We found a significantly higher oxidative potential in PM10 than in PM2.5 samples compared on both an equal volume and an equal mass basis.
The agreement between both appraisers' (AH and SJ) assessments was compared on 20% of the samples using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.
The undergraduate sample and social phobia sample were compared on the SBSA, the SBSA subscales, the SPS, and DASS depression.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com