Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
The structural data gained is compared mainly with weight and access criteria.
From the point of view of users we compared mainly comprehension of analysis specifications in each methodology.
The results are compared mainly with the self consistent model reported in the literature and good agreements are shown.
From the point of view of analysts we compared mainly quality, namely correctness of specifications created by analysts who utilized the two methodologies.
The authors in [14] claimed that '[Their] results achieve state-of-the-art precision in much shorter time; the speed up is one-two orders of magnitude with respect to the method in [13], and even larger compared to older methods [20 22].' Thus, in this article our suggested method would be compared mainly with PDL1P (the best-known method), in order to show its superiority.
Former studies on the serine pathway discussed the regulation of serine cycle enzymes in M. extorquens AM1 only partially, and compared mainly growth on C1 compounds to growth on C4 compounds [27], [29].
Similar(48)
However, these results are difficult to compare, mainly because of methodological differences, for example the type of economic evaluation, regarded outcomes, included cost components (depending on the chosen perspective) or the valuation of utilisation.
Other fractions that were included in the study, such as juvenile and mature sapwood and heartwood, were of interest to compare mainly for fundamental reasons.
It is not particularly useful to compare mainly between the 1995 and 2000 Demographic and Health (DHS) surveys, as some analysts have proposed (e.g. Singh et al., 2002), since much of Uganda's prevention "miracle" appears to have occurred in the late 1980s and probably into the early 1990s.
We also found that mainly younger patients had OSF compared with mainly older patients with OL.
Previously, scientists have compared performance mainly in terms of peak detection and peak quantification.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com