Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
DEMs were compared for two discharge conditions.
Wetting factors are calculated and compared for two geometries.
The BMI was compared for two groups: BMI ≤ 25 and BMI > 25.
In this section, results of Cosserat numerical solution are compared for two examples.
Prolactin (PRL) responses were compared for two groups of high and low BAS scorers.
FEM and industrial scale extrusion results are presented and compared for two different extrusion ratios.
Tritium breeding ratio is also compared for two coolant options: Li and LiPb eutectic.
Results are presented and compared for two cases: regenerative chatter under resonance and non-resonance conditions.
Measured and simulated profiles are compared for two cutting conditions and results correlate well.
The contribution of different phases and their associated uncertainty characterized and compared for two pavements.
The results were compared for two separators: Celgard 2402 and a microporous PVdF membrane.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com