Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The results of the univariate analysis were also compared for the data set of the complete feeding period and a data set of the first three feeding days.
Similar(59)
− 0.380 * PDQ 1 − 0.003 * PDQ 2 2 − 0.003 * PDQ 8 2 The models were compared for the best data fit with maximum R values, and minimum RMS values.
The resulting models were compared for the 13 species with sufficient data.
Several dynamic descriptors were calculated and compared for the observations and the simulated data.
The baseline data were compared for the three groups.
Self reported demographic data were compared for the two types of respondents.
The variables of GCT, iron supplementation, iodine intake assessment, and oral health were not compared for data completeness between the records.
The German Infratest Access Panel has been compared, for example, with data of the Statistical Yearbook of Germany.
The datasets were compared for data cleaning purposes and checked for internal consistency; any differences identified were checked against the source questionnaire.
These results are consistent with those for group 1 although the data for group 2 are scattered widely compared to the data for group 1.
Then both the original and the inverted word will be shifted circularly for each bit and compared with the data just sent for least hamming distance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com