Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Data files were compared for errors using a verification programme and referring to original questionnaires.
Survey data were independently entered into database interface forms using a standardized data dictionary and compared for errors and corrections.
All forms were entered twice by independent data entry clerks and data files were compared for errors using a verification programme and referring to original questionnaires.
Similar(57)
Both RAD and EST genotypes between parents and offspring were compared for inheritance error (genotypes in the offspring that do not correspond to the parental types), and erroneous genotypes were converted to missing data.
The total number of matrix inversions for the two group TG and the margin adaptive MA loading schemes are compared for two different error constraints.
The model-error and the data-error were compared for each perturbation function (see supplementary file 2).
Once all survey data were entered, the data were imported into standard statistical software, compared for accuracy, checked for logical errors, and cleaned and compiled.
Their average rates of change (slopes) ± their estimation errors were compared for significant differences with nonpaired Student's t tests, experiment by experiment.
These values can be compared, for instance, to the rounding error of IGRF-2015 (and SV-2015-2020) that is equal to about 1.5 nT (or nT/yr) for a precision of 0.1 nT on each Gauss coefficient (see Eq. 9).
An error estimate based on a two-mesh approach and a jump-based error indicator are compared for various test problems.
When the resulting images were compared for the PubChem entry CID7250053, an error was found in the depiction of the stereochemistry of an isopropyl group (Figure 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com