Sentence examples for compared for discussing from inspiring English sources

The analyses of the flat and curved laminates are compared for discussing their different damage mechanism.

Results from these 3 levels of molecular characterization are compared for concurrence and discussed in context of the pathogenesis of mOGCTs.

Their basic operational characteristics, design features and relative advantages and disadvantages are discussed and compared for PEV propulsion systems.

The performance of the TCOP cycle and the single-stage compression with expander (SCE) cycle is mainly discussed and compared for a wide operating condition.

The relationship between gas flow rate and rotational speed during flooding was discussed and compared for low and high porosity packing.

Further, reconstruction techniques of the radial void fraction profiles from the gamma densitometry's chordal void fraction measurements are discussed and compared for a bubble column reactor with dispersed microbubbles.

Crystallographic structure, surface roughness, surface wettability and the film thickness were assessed and used as a set of physical properties to be discussed and compared for each of the films and mutually.

Energy-fatigue life (W N) curves were further discussed and compared for their capabilities in assessing fatigue life of various joints through different parameters including curve slope, life data scatter, and how readily coefficients/constants are determined and employed in the energy methods.

All transcripts are coded separately by two independent researchers and are systematically discussed and compared for inter-rater reliability.

Various base isolation systems (BISs) such as the pure-friction, laminated rubber bearing, lead rubber bearing, resilient-friction base isolator and electricité de France systems, which have been used or are considered to have considerable potential for wide applications, are systematically compared and discussed for aseismic performances of multi-span continuous bridge in this study.

Ideas from each discussant were compared for similarities/differences and statements/conclusions were drawn for each of the topics discussed.