Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Afterwards the numerical results and the experimental ones are compared for assessment and simulation validation.
Similar(59)
These two methods are compared for the assessment of kinematics in the healthy and the anterior cruciate ligament injured knee.
Laboratory examinations were performed before and after administration of PIO, and the results were compared for toxicity assessment data.
GMPS imaging and TDI were compared for the assessment of LV diastolic dyssynchrony.
TDI and phase analysis on GMPS were then compared for the assessment of LV diastolic dyssynchrony.
PA and non-PA groups were compared for the assessment of factors associated with P. aeruginosa isolation, using the chi-square test with continuity correction for categorical variables.
Lateral plain radiographs taken at the preoperative, immediate postoperative and at the last follow-up period were compared for radiological assessment.
Three measurement variables were investigated and compared for the assessment of VOT-derived StO2 parameters: dominant arm versus nondominant arm, forearm versus thenar, and superficial tissue versus deep tissue (as measured by the different probe spacings).
In this study, four lung lesion scoring methods (Slaughterhouse Pleurisy Evaluation System [SPES], Consolidation Lung Lesion Score [LLS], Image analyses [IA] and Ratio of lung weight/body weight [LW/BW]) were compared for the assessment of the different pathological outcomes derived from an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App) experimental infection model.
PKH67 labelling was compared for classical proliferation assessment (using S phase evaluation) to analyse the cell proliferation of 29 AML patients treated or not with various drugs.
Preoperative and the last follow-up Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were obtained for clinical outcomes evaluation and X-rays of antero-posterior and frog-leg lateral views of bilateral hips were compared for radiological outcomes assessment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com