Sentence examples for compared execution from inspiring English sources

A 1993 stu​dy entitled "The Possible Pain Experienced During Execution by Different Methods" compared execution methods in 86 countries, including shooting, hanging, stoning, beheading, electrocution, gassing, and lethal injection.

Performance experiments were performed again using a bigger test set and we compared execution time in the "individual" mode with the execution time in the "federated" mode.

California, by contrast, sentenced 795 people to death from 1976 through 2002 and has executed only 10. Comparing execution statistics from the Justice Department with the number of murders the study cited, though, a different picture emerges.

The past-executions list stored in the CAMEL information repository offers the ability to compare execution statistics and identify the most successful configurations (i.e., identify best practices).

As projection methods in general, and the Kaczmarz and Cimmino algorithms in particular, are known to perform well in such settings, we chose to compare execution of Algorithm 3.3 to these two for benchmarking.

Figure 6b compares execution times between mDC in vacuum and periodic boundary conditions and a standard SCF implementation of DFTB3.

To evaluate the efficiency of using summary tables on filtering performance, we compared the execution time of our canvasDB filtering implementation with a simplistic method where variants are analyzed from separate database tables (see Methods for implementation details).

Furthermore, we created a separate section "Analyzing the algorithm performance" where we compared the execution time of the recommender system in both the "individual" and "federated" modes.

To assess the performance of the proposed cloud service, we compared the execution time between stand-alone SMAP and Cloud-PLBS.

To assess the performance of the proposed cloud service, we compared the execution time between stand-alone BLASTP and Cloud-BLASTP.

To further investigate the time differences between FARMS and more comparable stepwise approaches, we ran all the methods in the two scenarios (HLA and OLP) 100 times and compared their execution time by Student's t-test: Figure 4 summarizes the time of execution needed by each approach in addition to the time used in each run.