Exact(3)
Schuberth et al. [117] compared deep deltoid ligament integrity as seen with arthroscopy with corresponding medial clear space measurements in a clinical setting.
To detect diverse and novel RNA species comprehensively, we compared deep small RNA and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) methods applied to a primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) sample.
One compared deep needling at Jiaji (Ex-B2) to conventional acupuncture, showing greater benefit from deep needling after treatment (RR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.17; p=0.023) and at three-month follow-up (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27; p=0.016), respectively.
Similar(56)
To further explore the genome coverage bias introduced by WGA, we compared deep-sequenced data (~30×) amplified by DOP-1, MDA-2, MDA-3 or MALBAC respectively (Table 1), because LWGS data amplified by these four WGA kits had better genome recovery sensitivity or sequence evenness than other kits.
This figure is to compare DEEP with LLL, SLLL, and VLLL.
This paper compares deep groundwater with different host rocks and discusses the source of iodine contained in the water.
To compare deep circumflex iliac (DCI) and deep inferior epigastric (DIE) pedicles as potential recipient vessels for a whole ovarian microvascular transplantation.
A Rutter-type canopy interception model is combined with a 1-D physically-based soil water flow model to compare deep percolation rates below distinct land covers.
The aim of this study was to compare deep body temperature obtained using a novel noninvasive continuous zero-heat-flux temperature measurement system with core temperatures obtained using conventional methods.
To compare deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in eyes with corneal diseases not involving the corneal endothelium (keratoconus, scars after infectious keratitis, stromal dystrophies, and trauma).
We analyzed the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) landscape in AML by comparing deep sequencing from multiple RNA-seq library construction methods for the sample that we studied and then integrating RNA-seq data from 179 AML cases.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com