Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
compared by means of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "compared by means of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the method or approach used to compare two or more items, concepts, or data sets. Example: "The results were compared by means of statistical analysis to determine the significance of the findings."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
All approaches are finally compared by means of numerical simulations.
The performances of ANFIS, ANN and ECC were compared by means of prediction errors.
Science
These two MPC algorithms are compared by means of a numerical example.
Science
The different homogenization schemes are compared by means of effective directional dependent Young's modulus.
Differences were compared by means of Dunnett's test.
Science
Differences were compared by means of Tukey's multiple comparison test.
Science
Four receiver-operating-characteristic curves were generated and compared by means of the univariate z score.
Academia
Each treatment was compared by means of chi2 tests and piecewise linear mixed-effects models.
Academia
Qualitative variables were compared by means of the Chi-square test, with Fisher's correction when necessary.
Science
The 3 groups were compared by means of one-way analysis of variance.
In Section 4, performance of the introduced algorithms is compared by means of simulations.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "compared using" or "compared via" for a more concise and modern phrasing when appropriate, especially in less formal contexts. Always consider the tone and audience when choosing the most suitable option.
Common error
While grammatically correct, repeatedly using "compared by means of" can make your writing sound overly formal or verbose in informal settings. Opt for simpler alternatives like "compared using" or "compared through" to maintain a natural tone.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "compared by means of" functions as a prepositional phrase that specifies the method or instrument used to perform a comparison. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is considered correct. The phrase connects two entities, highlighting the methodology employed for their evaluation, as demonstrated by the examples.
Frequent in
Science
75%
Academia
25%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "compared by means of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used prepositional phrase, particularly in formal academic and scientific writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is suitable for contexts requiring a precise indication of the methodology employed in a comparison. While effective in such settings, simpler alternatives like "compared using" or "compared via" may be more appropriate for informal communication. Therefore, writers should consider their audience and the desired level of formality when deciding whether to use this phrase.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
compared using
Replaces the prepositional phrase "by means of" with a simpler and more direct preposition.
compared via
Substitutes "by means of" with "via", offering a slightly more concise alternative.
compared through
Replaces "by means of" with "through", suggesting a process or method.
compared with the aid of
Emphasizes the assistance or help provided by the method in the comparison.
compared utilizing
Uses a more formal verb, "utilizing", to indicate the use of a specific method.
compared employing
Similar to "utilizing", "employing" highlights the application of a particular technique.
compared by virtue of
Indicates that the comparison is made possible or justified by the specified method.
compared on the basis of
Focuses on the foundation or criteria used for the comparison.
compared according to
Suggests that the comparison follows specific rules or guidelines.
compared in light of
Implies that the comparison is conducted with consideration for a specific factor or aspect.
FAQs
What does "compared by means of" mean?
The phrase "compared by means of" indicates that a comparison was made using a specific method or tool. It's a formal way of saying something was compared "compared using" or "compared through" a particular technique.
What can I say instead of "compared by means of"?
You can use alternatives like ""compared using"", "compared via", or ""compared through"" depending on the context. These options are generally more concise and modern.
Is it better to say "compared by means of" or "compared using"?
Both phrases are grammatically correct, but ""compared using"" is often preferred in contemporary writing for its simplicity and directness. "Compared by means of" is more formal and may be suitable for academic or scientific contexts where precision is paramount.
When should I use "compared by means of"?
Use "compared by means of" in formal writing, such as academic papers, scientific reports, or legal documents, where a high degree of precision and formality is desired. In less formal contexts, consider using simpler alternatives like ""compared using"" or ""compared through"".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested