Sentence examples for compare verification from inspiring English sources

A full feature set and an arm-only feature set were used to compare verification performance.

Figure 8 shows the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves that compare verification performance of the features obtained from the Eigenfaces [13], scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [75], LBP [76], multiple kernel learning (MKL) [77], and the DGHMs.

Comparing verification metrics of all models, SETAR model presents the best forecasting performance.

By comparing verification tests and predicted results, the optimized operating conditions were pH 7.1, 22 °C, 32.5 % (14,000 U/ml) loading amounts of TreS enzyme and after 24 h, along with a 70.6 % trehalose conversion rate.

Additionally, current criteria used to compare the verification phase and incremental test V̇O2max still warrant further investigation.

We compare identity verification performance when either a full feature set or an arm feature set is used in both training and testing phases.

More recently, one study attempted to compare distinct verification phases, one at 105% of the peak work rate and another at two stages prior to the end of the incremental test [42].

The experimental and computational results were then compared for verification.

Certain results obtained from the receptance method and a finite element program were compared for verification purposes and showed good agreement.

By comparing the Verification Result Table with power supply security standards for urban areas in China, following a differential and hierarchical way to check one by one, the comparison result has a high reliability.

Univariate, multivariate and stepwise models of ≥ 5mm displacements showed an increased likelihood of displacement in weeks 1 and 2 with low melting point alloy (LMPA) blocks compared with multileaf collimators, film verification compared with electronic portal imaging (EPI) and increased number of fractions imaged.