Sentence examples for compare trials from inspiring English sources

The standardised mean difference (SMD) would be used to compare trials that measured the same outcome (construct), but used different scales.

However, these trials are conducted with different protocols, including use of different stem cell populations and different injection protocols, providing little means to compare trials and guide therapy.

Background: Small sample size and methodologic limitations make it difficult to interpret and compare trials of low molecular weight heparin (for example, enoxaparin) versus unfractionated heparin as prophylactic treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE), that is, deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

In order to compare trials with and without the interference task we calculated the difference in the bootstrap slope of each subjects' standard and interfered trials, and found the 95% confidence interval of this difference.

Our secondary aim was to characterize and compare trials performed in high- and non-high-income countries.

Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were obtained from the reported results to compare trials using different scales as outcome scales.

In order to establish causality, further research would first be required to compare trial reporting with actual trial conduct and then to compare these findings across locations.

Two groups of non-commercial multicentre RCTs were identified to compare trial delivery before and after NCRN was established.

Consequently, it is still difficult to compare trial results and to combine them in a meta-analysis.

An ongoing Cochrane review has identified studies that compare trial protocols with subsequent publications (K Dwan, personal communication, 2010).

Researchers compared trials of homeopathic and conventional medicines.