compare to previously

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "compare to previously" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used when discussing differences or similarities between current and past situations or data. Example: "When we compare to previously collected data, we can see significant improvements in performance."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Measurements were performed at 73 locations within each flame in order to resolve the spatial flame structure and compare to previously published studies.

Combustion and Flame

To establish how our failed extubation rate and subsequent mortality compare to previously published studies, whilst assessing the impact of previously proposed risk factors for extubation failure.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Here we solved the crystal structure of ALK2 in complex with LDN-212854 to define how its binding interactions compare to previously reported BMP and TGFβ receptor inhibitors.

Bone

To normalize against input, we used log2-ratios only to compare to previously published array data.

eLife

The hitherto additional parameter acquired can be used to compare to previously obtained vessel calibres as well as in conjunction with other metabolic or structural markers measured as part of an examination.

BMC Ophthalmology

An advantage of the map is the ability to compare to previously reported QTL studies made on microsatellite markers as well as the fact that 138 of the SNPs is represented on the new Illumina PorcineSNP60 Genotyping BeadChip [ 18].

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

That would be a change, compared to previously leaked efforts.

TechCrunch

Moreover, the proposed method is compared to previously published methods.

Pattern Recognition

The calculated results were compared to previously measured ones.

Energy and Buildings

Compared to previously reported equations, ours are 7 69% more accurate.

Applied Ergonomics

The proposed accumulator is compared to previously known designs.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for precision in formal writing, favor alternatives like "compared with earlier" or "in relation to previous findings" instead of "compare to previously".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "compare to previously" in academic papers or formal reports. It's often seen as grammatically awkward. Instead, choose more standard constructions such as "compared with earlier studies" for clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "compare to previously" functions as a prepositional phrase intended to introduce a comparison with something that occurred or existed at an earlier time. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrasing is not considered grammatically correct in standard English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "compare to previously" might seem intuitive, Ludwig AI indicates it's not considered grammatically correct in standard written English. It appears mainly in scientific and news contexts, but more precise alternatives like "compared with earlier" or "in relation to previous findings" are recommended for clarity and formality. When aiming for professional or academic writing, opting for these alternatives ensures better grammatical correctness and enhances the overall quality of your text. Remember that context matters, but prioritizing standard English constructions will generally lead to clearer communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compared with earlier

Replaces "to previously" with "with earlier", focusing on a specific point in the past.

compared against prior

Substitutes "to previously" with "against prior", which implies a more rigorous evaluation process.

in relation to what came before

Expands the comparison to include a broader consideration of past events or conditions.

assessed against historical

Highlights the evaluation aspect by using "assessed" and specifies "historical" data.

juxtaposed with past

Uses "juxtaposed" to indicate a side-by-side comparison, often to highlight contrasts.

measured beside former

Employs "measured beside" to suggest a quantifiable comparison with something from the past.

evaluated against earlier

Focuses on the evaluation aspect, suggesting a thorough analysis against prior instances.

in contrast with previous

Highlights the differences rather than similarities in the comparison.

when weighed against earlier

Implies a careful consideration of the relative importance or impact compared to what happened before.

analyzed in light of historic

Suggests an examination of the current situation based on insights gained from past events.

FAQs

Is "compare to previously" grammatically correct?

While sometimes used, "compare to previously" is not considered standard English. It's better to use phrases like "compared to" or "compared with" followed by a specific timeframe or data.

What are some alternatives to "compare to previously" in academic writing?

In academic writing, use alternatives like "compared with earlier studies", "in relation to previous findings", or "compared against prior data" for clarity and formality.

How can I rephrase "compare to previously" for better clarity?

To improve clarity, replace "compare to previously" with phrases such as "compared to what came before", "in relation to earlier results", or "assessed against historical data".

When is it acceptable to use "compare to previously"?

While not strictly incorrect, "compare to previously" is less common in formal writing. In casual conversation, it might be acceptable, but in professional or academic settings, it's best to opt for more precise and grammatically standard alternatives.