Exact(41)
Section 3.2 discusses the parameters by which we compare subjects in more detail.
In Experiment 2, we were able to compare subjects' ability on the two tasks: detection and location.
A fairer approach is to compare subjects' performance on the detection and location tasks with chance performance on those two tasks.
To compare subjects showing diffuse FDG activity and relatively intense FDG activity in the intestine, we combined groups 1 and 2 and compared them with group 3. To compare subjects with lower FDG activity and higher activity than the liver, we combined groups 2 and 3 and compared them with group 1.
The objective of the study was to compare subjects with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) with controls on prior surgeries.
In Experiment 2 we gathered those data, but before we could directly compare subjects' ability to detect manipulated photos with their ability to locate the manipulations within, we had to correct for guessing.
Similar(19)
(Please see our stacked gallery of 1862 photographs and engravings to compare subject, technique style and perspective).
To compare subject-to-subject electromyography data accurately, an independent reference of gait is desirable.
Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare subject characteristics.
Independent t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare subject characteristics and walking test variables as appropriate.
Dylan Matthews looked at research by Kim Fridkin and colleagues that compared subjects who watched a 2004 debate between George Bush and John Kerry.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com