As a result, outside researchers could not learn what trials of a drug had been performed so they could put findings in context or compare studies of competing drugs.
In order to accurately compare studies, ligature length used in protocols should be described.
A worldwide definition of criteria in pregnant women could help to better compare studies of ARF.
The first two columns compare studies using victimization surveys to studies using police reports for all places, whether or not the place was involved with crime.
It provides an index of surgical efficacy and is useful to compare studies carried out at different times and on heterogeneous patient populations.
Therefore, it is difficult to compare studies, because of the different test methodologies and variables used, and these issues remain controversial in the literature.
Although the same study did not compare studies obtained with water, positive, or no intraluminal contrast, optimal colonic distension by WE-MDCT should probably improve the limited accuracy reported for detection of CRC in the setting of IBD [32].
Furthermore, blood time-activity curves both with [3],[22] and without [23]-[25 [23]-[25ions for radioactive metabolites of [11C]HED have been used for RI, making it difficorrectionspare studies.
Moreover, other threshold values have also been adopted, such as ≤ 100 ml kg−1 or ≤ 50 ml kg−1 of O2 [25, 25] making it even more difficult to compare studies.
However, it is difficult to compare studies because the activities described often depend on the population (e.g., healthy vs. less-healthy older adults) and the location (e.g., outdoors vs. indoors) (Kelsey et al. 2010Kelsey et al. 2012).
The great variety of OS techniques, examination techniques, diagnostic criteria, and imaging techniques used in the articles studied, as well as the quality of the study designs, made it difficult to compare studies and to draw conclusions.
