Sentence examples for compare schemes from inspiring English sources

Following these results, we propose a time error index to compare schemes with different degrees of parallelisation.

Data transfer error is examined using analytical functions to compare schemes based on interpolation, area-weighted averaging, and L2 minimization.

Finally, in order to compare different parallelisation schemes, we introduce a time error index that combines time complexity (asymptotic order of the running time) and estimation accuracy (asymptotic error rates) into a single quantitative figure of merit that can be used to compare schemes with different degrees of interaction.

In Figure 2, we compare scheme (3.7) with the classical four-stage explicit Runge-Kutta methods for Example (4.1) with (tau=0.0001), (tau=0.00001).

Figure 10 The average end-to-end delays of all the compared schemes.

Under all the comparing schemes, network capacity increases according to the growth of P.

As anticipated, overall, average MAC delay for the QoS-Fi scheme is the shortest among all the compared schemes.

However, the total transmit power of the three compared schemes increase logarithmically when the sources' target rate increases.

Because NEMO does not consider intra-domain handoff, its HL is the longest among the compared schemes.

These compared schemes use 1 dB as the interval of bias value while 2 dB is used in our proposal.

Fixed packet duration for the different compared schemes: this corresponds to a fixed system bandwidth constraint (cfr. results in Figure 6).