Exact(5)
The key, therefore, is to compare questions within pollsters.
In order to compare questions produced by different question generation teams, Rus et al. (2010) identified five criteria for humans to use in judging the quality of questions: syntactic correctness, ambiguity, relevance, question type, and variety.
In order to compare questions generated from the knowledge base, mined from the web, and collected from textbooks, we first examined the coverage of the human-generated questions (the latter two categories) by the questions generated from the knowledge base.
The McNemar's test for categorical dichotomous (Yes/No answers) paired data was used to compare questions in 2004 vs 2007 and determine if any significant change in policy on MRSA screening had occurred.
Further studies should compare questions that either attribute or do not attribute participation to factors such as the environment or health conditions to determine if these phrases influence a person's response.
Similar(55)
Titled "Bill O'Reilly has his own Brian Williams problem", the report compared questions about O'Reilly's war stories with the combat zone fabrications for which the NBC anchor was suspended earlier this month.
Zhang and VanLehn (2016) compared questions generated by their methods to human-made questions from textbooks by asking students to rate the questions for their relevance, fluency, ambiguity, pedagogy, and depth.
In what follows, we analysed and compared questions generated by the two groups, one who was least successful and the other who was most successful in generating quality arguments.
Two other studies that evaluated an additional four PA questions in populations of older adults, examined validity by comparing questions with summary measures from PA recall questionnaires.
The qualifications regulator, Ofqual, compared question papers in biology and chemistry GCSEs, and biology, chemistry and geography A-levels between 2003 and 2008, and 2001 and 2010.
Please note that the mean rank values are compared by order of magnitude for only comparing question types for a particular user type.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com