We used the sliding window and compare plots in the program AWTY [ 59] to check for convergence in Bayesian analyses.
In addition, owing to the inter-variation, it is inadvisable to compare plots generated on different days.
Thus, for our comparisons we compared plot and map data at the aggregation level of the state.
In areas of medium to dense biomass, the FIA data were valuable for evaluating map accuracy by comparing plot biomass to pixel values.
The paper estimates these impacts chiefly by comparing plots with and without inputs within MVP sites.
Comparing plots (3a) and (3c), the discrepancy between author and index keywords is apparent.
We compared plots with high and low residual basal areas (60 and 40 m2 hand) and a control old-growth forest.
The possible maximum number of the two indices is 100%, indicating that the species composition of the compared plots is exactly the same.
We compared plot-to-plot β-diversity in the Alps and the Scandes to evaluate our second hypothesis that plot-to-plot β-diversity is higher in the Alps than in the Scandes.
Model fit was evaluated by using pseudo R values and comparing plots of predicted versus reported ILI cases.
The averaged values of enrichment of at least three treated samples were compared, plotted and expressed as fold change.
