Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(17)
The reviewers decided independently what data to collect and compare for each project, and held panel discussions to reach a consensus on the final ratings for each project.
Eötvös set up a torsion balance to compare, for each of two masses, the gravitational attraction of Earth with the inertial forces due to the rotation of Earth about its polar axis.
We compare, for each sampling strategy, the resultant consensus species distribution models for 28 woody plant species (trees and shrubs) developed at a spatial resolution of 25 m.
We compare for each indicator the AUCs of our chronology for Spain against those of the BCDC for the US to provide a benchmark.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit tests were used to compare, for each experiment, the observed radial distribution with a simulated uniform distribution.
This analysis enables us to compare, for each score bin defined by an algorithm, the proportion of target site predictions and the proportion of experimentally validated predictions falling within the bin; particularly, it shows the proportion of experimentally supported targets that overlap with the highest scoring bins.
Similar(43)
Four competing models were compared for each instrument.
Radiolucent line scores were calculated and compared for each group.
For the time-course study, changes in c-fos and substance P expression were compared for each time point.
The isotopic composition of throughfall and open rainfall were analyzed and compared for each rainfall event.
The sensitivity and the image contrast were compared for each filter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com