Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Laboratory and CXR costs were used to compare for cost-effectiveness.
Similar(59)
While DfID's programmes use proven interventions such as bednets, which compare favourably with global benchmarks for cost-effectiveness, the department has further to go to demonstrate that it has fully secured value for money, said the National Audit Office NAOO).
In addition, our results compared favourably with another benchmark for cost-effectiveness, the gross domestic product per capita in the respective countries [52], [53], as well as cost-effectiveness estimates for other interventions for malaria and bacterial infections [54], [55], [56].
In cost-effectiveness acceptability curves probabilities for cost-effectiveness, compared with standard care, ranged from 89% to 93% for SOD and from 63% to 72% for SDD, for acceptable costs for 1 LYG ranging from €0 to €20 000.
As Wilford et al. (2012) and Sharief et al. (2006) present their results in terms of the cost per DALY averted, it is possible to compare them with the WHO thresholds for cost-effectiveness.
As none of the articles presented their results in terms of the cost per DALY averted, it was not possible to compare them with the WHO thresholds for cost-effectiveness.
This result is highly cost-effective compared with the recent threshold (Jonsson, 2004) for cost-effectiveness.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are calculated to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the safe storage intervention and the potential for cost-effectiveness for the alternative strategies compared with status quo.
12 With this in mind, we present and compare the cost-effectiveness results for disease-specific health status, as measured by CRQ, and generic health status, as measured by quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
Objective: This study was performed to compare the cost-effectiveness of strategies for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grades 2 and 3 (CIN 2 and CIN 3).
Using a Markov model simulation, we compare the cost-effectiveness of screening for prediabetes (IFG) and T2DM with the strategy of no screening.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com