Exact(1)
We compare fairness performances of tree topologies with different degrees using this new metric.
Similar(58)
Figure11 compares fairness performances of tree, grid, and random topologies all with d = 4.
Fig. 8 Comparison of CCE, PP and NBS for F-MAC-WT, with no CSI of Eve (fixed transmission rate) Fig. 9 Comparing fairness of CCE, PP and NBS for F-MAC-WT, with no CSI of Eve (fixed transmission rate).
We further analyze and compare achieved fairness of the schemes in terms of different fairness indices available in literature.
In Figure 7, we compare the fairness among four schemes.
In order to compare with fairness, the rate gain in the reference [5] is modified.
We run the simulation for TCP NRT and TCP NewReno and compare their fairness index.
Comprehensive simulations have been carried out to compare the fairness of our protocol with the existing ones.
In particular we label the four solutions and compare their fairness from the point of view of possible application.
Comparing min max fairness to intuitive fairness, we can see that if a particular user k reduces its demand for utility, then there are more resources for the remaining users.
Finally, we compared the fairness and friendliness of TCP NRT.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com