Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(49)
Data were evaluated by the Pearson's Chi-Square method with SSPS software (Version 16.0) to compare between groups.
Thus, there is no single index of severity to compare between groups; nonetheless it was only in the Cell-BAL treated group that improvements were seen.
However, the notion of quality varied from one study to another and to date, there has been little attempt to compare between groups of learners that were the most and the least successful in producing quality arguments.
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures and Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to compare between groups by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) computer software for Windows.
To evaluate the SAR and to compare between groups we used exact binomial 95% confidence intervals, and χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential within-household correlation [22], [23], with a 5% type I error rate.
When comparing non-continuous variables (eg. symptom scores), area under the curve analysis from week 1 to week 20 followed by Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between groups.
Similar(11)
Student's t-tests and pearson's χ2 test was used to compare between-groups differences.
Univariate mixed model regression analyses compared between-group volume differences.
Trends were compared between groups.
The incidence of adverse reactions will be compared between groups.
Knowledge test and skill performances were compared between groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com