Sentence examples for comparator outcome from inspiring English sources
Application, population, comparator, outcome, intervention.
The search strategy was based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework and was conducted to find studies on sphenopalatine ganglion block, radiofrequency ablation and neurostimulation.
Using this information and the limited available evidence on Straticyte™, we narrowed the scope of this CEA by defining the Application, Population, Comparator, Outcome, and Intervention (APCOI) (Additional file 1: Table S2) [4].
To describe a systematic approach for identifying, reporting, and synthesizing information to allow consistent and transparent consideration of the applicability of the evidence in a systematic review according to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Setting domains.
The purpose of this study was to address the following Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, Study design and setting question: in patients with preoperative pain who undergo initial orthograde endodontic treatment, what is the comparative efficacy of NSAIDS compared with non-narcotic analgesics or placebo in reducing postoperative pain and the incidence of adverse events.
The review question was framed using Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS) framework.
PICO stands for Population Indication Comparator Outcomes and it is an important tool in evidence-based medicine.
Variables relating to study design, comparator, outcomes and findings were also extracted.
The primary author (MF) independently extracted data related to Participants, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study design by utilizing the PICOS strategy for describing trials (Table 2).
Studies selected for potential inclusion in the network were assessed for similarity in four criteria: baseline patient population, administration and frequency of common comparator, outcomes assessment, and length of follow-up.
The 'satisfaction of objectives' theme referred to issues related to the decision problem (population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and NICE base case) and whether or not these were satisfactorily addressed in the MS. Twenty of the 30 ERG reports raised issues with the trial populations presented in the MS and 18/30 raised various issues with the comparators.
