The T-shaped concentrator shows higher magnetic amplification with magnetic gain G = 56 but comparatively narrower linear working range of 1.6 mTesla.
Performance measures and self reported disability scores were examined comparatively using linear regression adjusting for potentially important factors identified as significantly different between residential groups: age, gender, living alone and education.
Collectively, these developing fields may form part of a general paradigm shift in both scientific and popular thought away from the linear, comparatively predictable world of, say, planetary orbits, and the top-down hierarchies of traditional forms of organization (businesses, governments, or artifacts) toward a more bottom-up, self-organizing, and emergent way of looking at the world.
We have shown previously that the cubic model shows extremely high evolution rate comparatively with the linear and even quadratic models under the same value of the parameter λ [ 43].
The electrocatalytic oxidation of d-glucose on Ni electrodes has been investigated comparatively to that of linear (C2C6) polyols by cyclic voltammetry at various concentrations, sweep rates and working temperatures.
Logarithmic, exponential, and power models were also good, but their RMSE was comparatively high than the linear or quadratic models.
They are characterized by an adjustment phase (≤3 5% strain), in which sample irregularities are evened out, followed by a comparatively narrow range of linear elastic deformation (<10%).
Although widely used now to solve everyday decision problems, linear programming was comparatively unknown before 1947.
Four time domain methods to estimate the interfacial forces are proposed and comparatively evaluated with application to linear time-invariant, proportionally damped discrete systems.
Based on the equivalent infinitesimal functions and differentials as well as linear approximations as comparatively simple mathematical tools, we prove that the distributed consensus is asymptotically reachable and derive the group decision values.
