This looks to be a thick evaluative claim, albeit a comparative one.
Other approaches include the comparative one, in which data from different species are used.
We identified seven comparative studies: two randomized clinical trials and five observational studies.
Among the seven comparative studies, six studies included fewer than 30 patients [ 18- 23]; one of the two randomized clinical trials included 776 patients [ 24].
Four comparative studies, seven non-comparative prospective studies, and 16 retrospective case series were identified that looked at PL, or EPP, or PL and EPP.
Of the five prospective comparative trials, four were non-randomized studies and one was a randomized design.
"Six months is comparative to five years in a traditional venture market".
The pair will be used in a comparative study: one in space, one on the ground.
For comparison purpose, three comparative neural networks (two dynamic and one static neural networks) were performed.
For comparative purposes, two control groups were included.
