MAL-NUT is a non-randomized non-blinded comparative trial designed to compare the efficacy of AL and the lumefantrine pharmacokinetic profile in SAM versus non-SAM children.
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare pairs of groups in the open-label comparative trial.
A monocentric, randomized, double-blind, comparative trial was conducted in 60 AE patients to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the two emollients.
Apart from one where the comparative trial arm involved additional medication monitoring [ 39], all the interventions were compared with usual care.
In the six-month comparative trial, Rebif patients had a 90percentt greater chance of avoiding a relapse than patients on Avonex.
At Harvard, Willett, Blackburn and Penelope Greene have money, albeit from Atkins's nonprofit foundation, to do a comparative trial as well.
In order to validate this approach, a randomized comparative trial evaluating SC has been initiated.
Desogestrel use failed to exert a significant effect on non-migrainous-headache in our sample and the comparative trial.
To the best of our knowledge, no (randomized) comparative trial of dynamization alone versus other techniques has been performed.
It is a non-randomized comparative trial with equal allocation, consisting of 60 patients with freshly diagnosed mid-shaft clavicular fractures.
We used a comparative trial characterized by a run-in phase followed by a double-blind period during which the subjects received either CIN or SV.
