Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The gene sets fulfilling the criteria p < 0.05, FDR <0.25, and comparative p < 0.20 were defined as differentially expressed.
In particular, similar normalized fold expression between qRT-PCR data and reads mapped to the A. thaliana orthologs were observed in the genes RBCS1A (high expression), ATP3, SCE1A, SFGH (moderate expression), and ARF6, PGLUHYD, OMR1, and SPL7 (low expression) P >0,01 (Additional file 1: Table S4 shows the comparative P values for the ANOVA tests).
Similar(58)
Our analysis of a large number of clinical strains over 20 years reinforced the validity of VP1 serotyping and showed that comparative p-distance scores can be coupled with phylogenetic analysis to provide non-ambiguous serotype identification.
The comparative p-value denotes the percentage of random gene sets of the same size that would have a larger test statistic than the gene set in question.
Comparative P-values were calculated for each gene set and indicate the proportion of random gene sets of the same size as the tested gene set being significant by chance.
The results show the proportion widowed/divorced parent to be greater (3.7 fold) in the migrant family group than in comparative families (p < 0.001).
Means and standard deviations were calculated and comparative statistics used (P <.05).
Figure 4 shows the comparative detection probability (P d ) performance as a function of the SNR.
Open image in new window Fig. 4 Comparative diagram displaying P R values of the H. triquetrifolium Turra extracts, obtained with water and 10%% (w/v) aqueous glycerol, at 70 °C after 95 min.
In comparative studies the p values or t tests were analyzed to estimate the r value.
Open image in new window Fig. 16 Comparative activity of Pd nanoparticles dispersed over amorphous, 2D non-interconnected SBA-15 and 3D interconnected SBA-16 and KIT-6 mesoporous silicas in the selective aerobic oxidation of crotyl alcohol.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com