Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Pollitt (2012b) has consistently argued that comparative judgment can be conducted at a comparable or lower cost to analytical, traditional marking and that comparative judgement provides consistently high reliability.
Furthermore, Thurstone's law of comparative judgment calls for pairwise comparisons.
However, this assessment is best seen as making a comparative judgment.
Ultimately the researchers found that the comparative judgment method of scoring was more reliable than analytical marking.
Two bearers of value are held to be incomparable if no positive comparative judgment of their value is true.
Quantitative analysis of the frequency of first response was done by χ2 test and Thurstone's law of comparative judgment.
Similar(43)
Positive comparative judgments of value specify the way in which two items compare (e.g., "better than") rather than the way in which two items do not compare (e.g., "not better than") in virtue of some value.
It was a lesson in the spread of the cult of Hobbesian competition, where comparative judgments are all and absolute judgments nothing.
It's plausible, in fact, that the standards we appeal to in support of comparative judgments within a genre (complexity, subtlety, depth, authenticity and so on) could just as well be used to judge one genre, overall, better than another.
We studied the size weight illusion through comparative judgments.
He first points out that we can make comparative judgments, even if we do not make absolute judgments, and that comparative judgments presuppose some absolute standard.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com