Sentence examples for comparative judgement from inspiring English sources

Pollitt (2012b) has consistently argued that comparative judgment can be conducted at a comparable or lower cost to analytical, traditional marking and that comparative judgement provides consistently high reliability.

First, the comparative judgement approach adopted can be applied successfully in different contexts, including higher education and secondary school.

Researchers have identified several limitations of comparative judgement.

Assessors accessed these files using online scoring tools to facilitate analytical marking and comparative judgement.

Thus the discriminal process leads to the comparative judgement and affects the time taken.

These studies have provided evidence of the efficacy in using digital assessment systems for relative comparative judgement.

One of the main reasons for high reliability of relative comparative judgements compared to absolute analytical judgements is that, relative judgements require larger numbers of judges.

"What we're hoping is that the million dollars will stretch enough so that comparative judgements will not have to be made," Merritt said.

Comparative judgements are independent and additional judgements increase reliability (Bramley et al., 1998; Pollitt, 2012a).

Once again the ACJS was used to facilitate the comparative judgements.

Pollitt has also consistently supported the argument that comparative judgements, specifically adaptive comparative judgements, can generate "extremely reliable scores, far higher than traditional marking" with little training (Pollitt, 2012a, p. 168).