Sentence examples for comparative incidence from inspiring English sources

We quantified SSTI incidence, type, and complications and comparative incidence trends for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and pneumonia.

Because suicide-related events are so rare, individual clinical trials are too small to collect data on either the incidence of such events or comparative incidence rates [ 13].

In other countries, comparative incidence surveillance programs exist: Germany NRZ-KISSS), NRZ-KISS, BelgiumNSIHnd (NINSS), Austria (ANISS), FrancEnglandUS (Woodhead et al. 2002), aNINSSstrAustriaICNISS).

Thus, the comparative incidence of the two viruses is consistent with findings in studies conducted in India, China and Bosnia-Herzegovina [ 3, 5, 25].

Comparative incidences of CAAKI from different centers of developing countries are shown in Table  4.

The comparative incidences are 15.3% in Japan, 14.0% in Taiwan, 11.2% in Korea, 2.3% in USA, and 2.5% in German in various reported series [ 1- 5].

The number of included studies exceeds the number of included study reports due to the comparative incidences of study reports that report multiple studies (i.e. two or more studies reported in the same publication) and studies reported in single or multiple study reports among studies/reports that we identified as meeting eligibility criteria for this review.

In the present comparative trial, the incidence of knee pain as judged by a knee function questionnaire was no different in either group at 6 months or >24 months.

In a meta-analysis of randomized comparative studies, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve after cervical esophagogastrostomy were higher than those of intrathoracic anastomosis, but the sample sizes of the studies were small.

They found no relevant comparative studies for incidence of repeat attendance, only one study which reported a direct comparison of type of injury in abused and non-abused children, and three studies for child age.

Before considering the contemporary cohort, it is worth noting that this is not a comparative study of admission incidence in a historical and contemporary cohort and can only study the 'true' incidence of the illness by proxy.