"comparative evaluation with" is a grammatically correct phrase and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to compare and contrast the qualities, characteristics, or performance of two or more things. Example: In order to make an informed decision, a comparative evaluation with similar products in the market is necessary.
A comparative evaluation with other methodologies and the results of its adoption in the context of the Athena EU Integrated Project are also discussed.
The comparative evaluation with SYBR Green I-based real-time RT-PCR revealed an accordance of 96% with a sensitivity and specificity of 95%and97%7%, respectively.
A case study is conducted and the results are discussed through a sensitivity analysis and a comparative evaluation with fuzzy TOPSIS.
A comparative evaluation with the proposed controller, a conventional PID controller specifically designed for this system and a QFT robust controller, was done.
A comparative evaluation with other methodologies, as well as the results of its adoption in the context of the European Interop Network of Excellence and Athena Integrated Project, are also discussed.
We carry out a comparative evaluation with the best methods that can be found in the literature for the total tardiness objective, and with adaptations of other state-of-the-art methods originally proposed for other objectives, mainly makespan.
We provide comparative evaluations with generalized Bayesian filtering (dynamic expectation maximization) and demonstrate marked improvements in accuracy and computational efficiency.
The proposed technique is applied over the most challenging synthetic problems to test its optimality on evolving networks and over the benchmark problems to test its generalization capability as well as to make comparative evaluations with the several competing techniques.
An additional contribution of this paper is an exhaustive comparative evaluation conducted with respect to one of the reference work in the field of Hidden Markov Models (HMM) for NILM, i.e., the Additive Factorial Approximate Maximum a Posteriori (AFAMAP) algorithm.
Csendes et al. (23) also performed a comparative evaluation of patients with morbid obesity who underwent LRYGB alone or combined with omentectomy.
A comparative evaluation was done with the conventional wetland system and better treatment efficiency was observed in the bio-rack system.
