Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
Comparable results were reported by Bouché et al. who compared the sequence LV5FU2 followed by FOLFOX (2nd-line) followed by FOLFIRI (3rd-line) to the more conventional sequence of FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (2nd-line) [ 25].
Similar comparable results were reported by Bombaci et al. [7] and Togrul et al. [8] in their patients treated by delayed surgical treatment.
Comparable results were reported by other groups employing 64-slice CT [15], indicating a still suboptimal spatial and temporal as well as contrast resolution of CT.
Comparable results were reported [ 21, 22].
Comparable results were reported by Maiya et al. [ 20].
Comparable results were reported by Bertherat et al. [ 8].
Similar(44)
In contrast, at the highest temperature of 270 °C and WHSV of 5.13 h−1, increased selectivity towards the cracked products was observed with increased reaction pressures, with comparable results being reported by Chao et al. [32] who investigated the effect of reaction pressure over the range 1 41.3 bar on mordenite catalysts with different Si/Al ratios and the zeolite Beta.
Comparable results are reported only in trials that enrolled only patients with minimal or no residual disease after the first surgery (Alberts et al, 1996; Markman et al, 2001; ICON Collaborators, 2002; Armstrong et al, 2006), and in other studies that considered the subgroup of patients with this positive prognostic factor (du Bois et al, 2006; Pfisterer et al, 2006).
Because inferences based on ln-transformed lead were comparable (data not shown), results are reported for lead modeled as an untransformed variable for ease of interpretation.
Because inferences based on square transformed cIMT were comparable (data not shown), results are reported for cIMT as an untransformed variable for easier interpretation.
However, as results were comparable for both analyses untransformed results are reported herein.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com