Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

comparable for both

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "comparable for both" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing two or more items, situations, or entities that can be compared in a meaningful way for both parties involved. Example: "The results of the two studies are comparable for both researchers, allowing them to draw similar conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In a randomized trial comparing CTC with colonoscopy screening, serious adverse events were comparable for both procedures, (0.2% for CTC; 0.3% for colonoscopy) [ 12].

Yet Balanchine's choreography and décor are comparable for both pieces: severe leotards and tights, a bare stage, angular movement and quirkily varied geometric patterns.

The equilibrium time was low and comparable for both adsorbents.

The selectivity against nitrogen was comparable for both membranes.

However, liver uptake was significant and comparable for both tracers at all time points.

Incidence and severity of hyperkalaemia (>5.0 mmol/l) were comparable for both protocols.

Moreover it was found that generally the computational efforts were comparable for both algorithms.

Finally, the total energy transferred to the wall is comparable for both flames.

However, TMPs selectivity was comparable for both catalysts at 5.5 h TOS.

The results are comparable for both kinds of datasets, showing that randomly selected subsets are representative of the clustered datasets.

For pre-operative planning, the NNS (1.3 vs. 1.4) and NNH (3.7 vs. 3.4) were comparable for both models.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "comparable for both", ensure that you have clearly defined the two elements you are comparing to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "comparable for both" when referring to more than two subjects. The phrase is specifically designed to compare only two items or entities. For multiple subjects, use "comparable across all".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "comparable for both" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that two distinct entities share similar characteristics or qualities. Ludwig provides examples illustrating its use in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

84%

News & Media

8%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "comparable for both" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate similarities between two distinct subjects. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its correctness and widespread use across various contexts, particularly in scientific literature. The phrase is most effectively employed when the similarities between the two subjects being compared are significant and relevant. While simpler alternatives exist, "comparable for both" offers a precise way to convey equivalence or near-equivalence.

FAQs

How can I use "comparable for both" in a sentence?

Use "comparable for both" to indicate that two things are similar or equivalent in some way. For example: "The results were comparable for both groups."

What's a simple substitute for "comparable for both"?

You can use simpler alternatives such as "similar for both", or "alike for both" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "comparable between" instead of "comparable for both"?

While "comparable between" is grammatically acceptable, "comparable for both" is more specific when explicitly referring to two entities. "Comparable between" is better suited for comparisons involving more than two items.

What is the difference between "comparable for both" and "identical for both"?

"Comparable for both" implies similarity, while "identical for both" suggests that the items are exactly the same in every aspect. Choose the phrase that most accurately represents the relationship you're describing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: