communities with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "communities with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe groups of people or organizations that share a common characteristic or interest. Example: "We aim to support communities with diverse cultural backgrounds to promote inclusivity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

However, real online communities with more interaction and actual communication exist.

The New York Times

Communities with high unemployment slip into decay.

The Guardian - Business

Good businesses are communities with a purpose.

Harvard Business Review

He questioned men in tiny communities with names like Bitterwater.

The New York Times - Science

It is particularly common in communities with poor sanitation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Often, large stumps exist in communities with plentiful tree cover.

The New York Times

Communities with growing economies would reject the Taliban.

The New York Times

In communities with smart growth this is a fading problem.

The Economist

That poses practical problems for communities with few public employees.

The Washington Post

You have these huge, sprawling communities with no center.

The New York Times

Both were strongly backed by their ethnic communities, with deep mistrust on either side.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing "communities with" specific needs, be precise about those needs to facilitate targeted support and solutions.

Common error

Avoid generalizing about "communities with" shared traits. Recognize the diversity within these communities to ensure your language is nuanced and respectful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "communities with" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun by specifying a characteristic or attribute that the communities possess. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is a usable and correct way to describe groups of people with shared traits.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "communities with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for describing groups sharing common traits. According to Ludwig AI, it is a correct and usable way to express this concept. It's versatile enough for news, scientific discussions, and general communication. When employing this phrase, be specific about the characteristics you're highlighting and recognize the diversity within those communities to avoid oversimplification. Using related phrases, such as "populations possessing" or "areas containing", can also provide nuanced alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

collectives having

Indicates that a group collectively possesses something.

populations possessing

Highlights the characteristic that the population owns or has.

localities characterized by

Emphasizes the defining features of a specific place.

groups displaying

Focuses on observable traits or attributes within a group.

areas containing

Focuses on geographic locations that include specific features.

societies featuring

Indicates notable aspects or qualities of a society.

districts including

Highlights areas that encompass specific elements.

regions harboring

Emphasizes the idea of areas providing shelter or support for something.

segments exhibiting

Focuses on demonstrable traits or behaviors within a segment of the population.

demographics showing

Highlights the statistical characteristics that a population demonstrates.

FAQs

How can I use "communities with" in a sentence?

You can use "communities with" to describe groups of people sharing a common attribute. For example, "We support "communities with limited resources"".

What are some alternatives to "communities with"?

Alternatives include "areas containing", "populations possessing", or "groups displaying", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "communities with" or "communities that have"?

Both "communities with" and "communities that have" are grammatically correct. "Communities with" is often more concise, but "communities that have" may be clearer in some contexts.

What's the difference between "communities with" and "in communities"?

"Communities with" describes a characteristic shared by the community, while "in communities" refers to actions or events occurring within those communities. For example, "communities with high unemployment" versus "programs implemented in communities".