The phrase 'communication is made' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used when something has been communicated. For example: After several attempts, communication is made between the two parties.
A comparison of Rendezvous and existing primitives and language constructs to solve interprocess synchronization and communication is made.
In his letter to May, Farron said: "As you know, and as the judgment outlines, the prime minister is notified by yourself when a request that an MP or a parliamentarian's communication is made by the security services.
Accordingly, if such a communication is made to one or more members of the general public in that state or locality, the communication is a direct lobbying communication (unless it is nonpartisan analysis, study or research (see paragraph (c)(1) of this section).
From time to time, University departments, faculty, students and others may host electronic communication forums, such as chat rooms, newsgroups, bulletin boards, blogs, or web sites, whereby various parties may contribute their thoughts on various subjects and where such communication is made available for others to read and comment upon.
There is no such provision in the Constitution, and the settled usage of this Government, without a single exception from its foundation, is that no communication is made by the Executive to either House except to the House in session, and that usage ought to have a controlling influence to exclude the idea which is contained in the provision of the bill that I am now referring to...
Therefore, after a failure, broadcast communication is made and other nodes at the top of the list must assume the execution.
Mr. Nocera is mistaken, however, in suggesting that electronic communication is making the Postal Service obsolete — and especially in calling for privatization of the world's most efficient and least expensive postal system.
In the case study, a breakdown in communication is making a sticky situation even worse.
The electronic age of communication is making it easier for activists, companies, and lobbying groups to use state open records laws designed to promote transparency to harass academic researchers they disagree with, a scientific integrity group warns in a new report.
Overall, it is a fair question to ask whether the ubiquitous presence of digital communication is making cultural transmission more preservative than reconstructive and what the consequences are of this transformation.
