Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(15)
Although there is a body of research addressing communication within healthcare [ 15, 24- 27], limited research has focussed on the challenge of communicating evidence to patients in the context of the community setting, such as general practitioner (GP) surgeries and health centres.
The data were grouped into three main themes: communicating evidence to the critically-minded patient; confidence in communicating evidence; and maintaining the integrity of the patient-practitioner relationship.
These capture participants' perceptions of 'communicating evidence to the critically-minded patient', 'confidence in communicating evidence', and 'maintaining the integrity of the patient-practitioner relationship'.
Our findings complement previous work that has explored health practitioners' experiences of communicating evidence [ 23, 28].
This research highlights some of the emerging challenges that health practitioners face around communicating evidence in practice.
The literature underscores the critical impact of communicating evidence in a clear, conclusive, and accessible way [ 16, 43].
Similar(45)
The challenge for those communicating evidence-based health-care messages is clearly shown in this one episode from our recent history.
However, some of our participants found it challenging to balance their delicate longer-term relationships with patients alongside communicating evidence-based information, and as a result would sometimes choose not to communicate evidence.
How can physicians best communicate evidence to people facing treatment decisions to improve understanding, involvement in decision-making and clinical outcomes?
To assess how well do the black box warnings present and communicate evidence in a way that is consistent with evidence-based patient-centered practice, through evaluating the boxed warning on teriparatide-induced osteosarcoma.
It is essential to generate and communicate evidence in a way that enables decision-makers to understand the value of investing in prevention while taking into account their priorities, interests and constituencies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com