Pat Buchanan drafted Nixon's veto message, in which Nixon said that "for the Federal Government to plunge headlong financially into supporting child development would commit the vast moral authority of the National Government to the side of communal approaches to child rearing".
Nobody remembers this, because, later that year, President Nixon vetoed the Comprehensive Child Development Act, declaring that it "would commit the vast moral authority of the National Government to the side of communal approaches to child rearing" and undermine "the family-centered approach".
In 1971, President Richard M. Nixon vetoed a bill that would have underwritten child care for everyone, arguing that the bill "would commit the vast moral authority of the national government to the side of communal approaches to child rearing over against the family-centered approach".
Nixon's veto statement warned that subsidizing child care would "commit the vast moral authority of the National Government to the side of communal approaches to child rearing over against the family-centered approach".
Moreover, data from the current study also suggest that the impact of communal approaches may vary based on outcome.
Together, these studies suggest that more work is needed to determine whether survivors of cancer and their family members can benefit from communal approaches.
