Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
We have a common set of objectives.
But we believe in a common set of ideals.
It did not envision a common set of economic regulations, or even a common currency.
Suppose, that is, you have a set of premises and a putative conclusion.
A set of premises preferentially entails A if and only if A is true in all the models that preferentially satisfy the premises.
But most of the protesters are working from a much different set of premises.
If the set of premises is not empty, then all the dialogical games contain it.
As one set of premises are assumed, the other becomes problematic.
Deductive consequence is monotonic: if a set of premises logically entails a conclusion, than any superset (any set of premises that includes all of the first set) will also entail that some conclusion.
The illative core is the set of premises offered in support of the conclusion; the dialectical tier consists of alternative points of view, likely objections to the conclusion, and the premises and whatever assumptions characterize debate about the conclusion.
Rather than say, 'A is supported to degree r by the set of premises {B1, B2, B3,…,Bn}', we say 'A is supported to degree r by the premise (…((B1·B2)·B3)·…·Bn)', and write this as 'P[A | (…((B1·B2)·B3)·…·Bn)] = r'.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com