Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
common mode noise rejection
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "common mode noise rejection" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts related to engineering and electronics. For example, a research paper could discuss the effectiveness of various types of common mode noise rejection methods.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
In this regard a dual-frequency laser (DFL) is interesting as the relative fluctuations between the two frequencies are low and can be used to generate a low-phase-noise microwave carrier due to the common-mode noise rejection effect [13, 15 17].
It has been shown to exhibit several advantages over other resonant methods, in particular a potential for higher sensitivity and rejection of common mode noise.
The interference fringe from output fibers go to a dual balanced detection system, which rejects the common mode noise.
Science
Moreover, adoption of differential scheme with a moderate tradeoff of area effectively lowers power supply noise and common mode noise.
Science
There is no evidence for common mode noise problems and 99.8% of the 3.2 million channels of the SCT barrels are functional.
The common mode noise is emitted by the noise current due to the unbalanced current, which has the potential to radiate electric field noise through the specific impedance, such as the impedance of the satellite structure.
Science
As shown in this figure, there are two limit levels, which signify the normal and the common mode noises.
Science
A fully differential topology has also been chosen for better rejection of common-mode noise and disturbances.
However, a new approach using a genetically-engineered cell-based biosensor (GECBB) described in this paper translates this cross-talk noise into common-mode noise that can be rejected.
Simulated results demonstrate that, with the same area of 5.5mm by 10 mm, rejection bandwidth of the proposed filter is from 4.4 GHz to 10.5 GHz for the common-mode noise (CM) while that of the traditional dumbbell-shaped DGS is from 5.3 GHz to 7.3 GHz.
A compact common-mode filter is proposed to suppress common-mode noise for application of high-speed differential signal traces.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing "common mode noise rejection", specify the method or technology used to achieve this rejection for clarity. For instance, mention 'differential amplifiers' or 'common-mode chokes' to provide context.
Common error
Avoid using "common mode noise rejection" without specifying the origin or nature of the noise. For example, clarify whether the noise is from power lines, environmental interference, or internal circuit imbalances.
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "common mode noise rejection" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to describe a characteristic, capability, or function of a system or component, often in technical contexts. This is consistent with Ludwig AI's assessment and the examples provided.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "common mode noise rejection" accurately describes a system's ability to eliminate noise present in multiple inputs, which is primarily discussed within scientific and technical contexts. Although Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, examples of its usage are absent from the provided dataset, indicating a need to specify implementation details and noise origins for clarity. Alternatives like "common-mode noise mitigation" or "rejection of common-mode signals" can offer varied expressions, but precision in describing the technology and noise source remains crucial. The phrase's formal register and scientific focus emphasize its technical nature.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
rejection of common-mode signals
A more formal way of expressing the same concept as "common mode noise rejection".
common-mode noise mitigation
Focuses on lessening the impact of common-mode noise, similar to rejection but with a slightly broader scope.
common mode interference suppression
Emphasizes the act of preventing or reducing common mode interference, closely related to noise rejection.
common-mode signal cancellation
Highlights the process of nullifying the common-mode signal, a specific method of noise rejection.
differential noise reduction
Describes noise reduction techniques that exploit differential signaling to minimize common-mode noise.
common-mode distortion filtering
Specifies the use of filters to remove common-mode distortion, which includes noise.
noise immunity enhancement
Addresses improving the overall resistance to noise, including common-mode noise.
common-mode error mitigation
Focuses on reducing errors caused by common-mode signals, related to noise.
common-mode artifact reduction
Addresses the decrease of unwanted artifacts resulting from common-mode noise.
noise filtering techniques
General term for specific methods employed to improve device/signal performance.
FAQs
How is "common mode noise rejection" implemented in circuits?
Common mode noise rejection can be implemented using techniques such as differential amplifiers, which amplify the difference between two signals while rejecting signals common to both. Other methods include using common-mode chokes or filters designed to attenuate common-mode noise.
What are some advantages of "common mode noise rejection"?
Advantages of common mode noise rejection include improved signal integrity, reduced interference, and enhanced system performance. By eliminating common noise, the desired signal can be more accurately measured and processed.
Which is better, "common mode noise rejection" or signal shielding?
"Common mode noise rejection" and signal shielding are complementary techniques. Signal shielding reduces noise from external sources, while common mode noise rejection eliminates noise that is common to multiple signal paths. The best approach is to use both.
What are some real-world applications of "common mode noise rejection"?
Applications include audio amplifiers, where it reduces hum and noise from power lines; instrumentation amplifiers, where it minimizes interference in sensor measurements; and communication systems, where it improves data transmission accuracy.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested