Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

common mode noise rejection

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "common mode noise rejection" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts related to engineering and electronics. For example, a research paper could discuss the effectiveness of various types of common mode noise rejection methods.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

In this regard a dual-frequency laser (DFL) is interesting as the relative fluctuations between the two frequencies are low and can be used to generate a low-phase-noise microwave carrier due to the common-mode noise rejection effect [13, 15 17].

It has been shown to exhibit several advantages over other resonant methods, in particular a potential for higher sensitivity and rejection of common mode noise.

The interference fringe from output fibers go to a dual balanced detection system, which rejects the common mode noise.

Moreover, adoption of differential scheme with a moderate tradeoff of area effectively lowers power supply noise and common mode noise.

There is no evidence for common mode noise problems and 99.8% of the 3.2 million channels of the SCT barrels are functional.

The common mode noise is emitted by the noise current due to the unbalanced current, which has the potential to radiate electric field noise through the specific impedance, such as the impedance of the satellite structure.

As shown in this figure, there are two limit levels, which signify the normal and the common mode noises.

A fully differential topology has also been chosen for better rejection of common-mode noise and disturbances.

However, a new approach using a genetically-engineered cell-based biosensor (GECBB) described in this paper translates this cross-talk noise into common-mode noise that can be rejected.

Simulated results demonstrate that, with the same area of 5.5mm by 10 mm, rejection bandwidth of the proposed filter is from 4.4 GHz to 10.5 GHz for the common-mode noise (CM) while that of the traditional dumbbell-shaped DGS is from 5.3 GHz to 7.3 GHz.

A compact common-mode filter is proposed to suppress common-mode noise for application of high-speed differential signal traces.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "common mode noise rejection", specify the method or technology used to achieve this rejection for clarity. For instance, mention 'differential amplifiers' or 'common-mode chokes' to provide context.

Common error

Avoid using "common mode noise rejection" without specifying the origin or nature of the noise. For example, clarify whether the noise is from power lines, environmental interference, or internal circuit imbalances.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

77%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "common mode noise rejection" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to describe a characteristic, capability, or function of a system or component, often in technical contexts. This is consistent with Ludwig AI's assessment and the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "common mode noise rejection" accurately describes a system's ability to eliminate noise present in multiple inputs, which is primarily discussed within scientific and technical contexts. Although Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, examples of its usage are absent from the provided dataset, indicating a need to specify implementation details and noise origins for clarity. Alternatives like "common-mode noise mitigation" or "rejection of common-mode signals" can offer varied expressions, but precision in describing the technology and noise source remains crucial. The phrase's formal register and scientific focus emphasize its technical nature.

FAQs

How is "common mode noise rejection" implemented in circuits?

Common mode noise rejection can be implemented using techniques such as differential amplifiers, which amplify the difference between two signals while rejecting signals common to both. Other methods include using common-mode chokes or filters designed to attenuate common-mode noise.

What are some advantages of "common mode noise rejection"?

Advantages of common mode noise rejection include improved signal integrity, reduced interference, and enhanced system performance. By eliminating common noise, the desired signal can be more accurately measured and processed.

Which is better, "common mode noise rejection" or signal shielding?

"Common mode noise rejection" and signal shielding are complementary techniques. Signal shielding reduces noise from external sources, while common mode noise rejection eliminates noise that is common to multiple signal paths. The best approach is to use both.

What are some real-world applications of "common mode noise rejection"?

Applications include audio amplifiers, where it reduces hum and noise from power lines; instrumentation amplifiers, where it minimizes interference in sensor measurements; and communication systems, where it improves data transmission accuracy.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

77%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: