Sentence examples for common law tort from inspiring English sources

As such, the courts must take Article 162 of the Constitution into consideration when deciding whether the common law tort of defamation offends the fundamental liberty of freedom of speech and expression.

"Defendants' actions violate ExxonMobil's constitutionally protected rights of freedom of speech, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, and due process of law and constitute the common law tort of abuse of process," Exxon told a Tarrant County, Texas, court, according to a filing posted by InsideClimate News.

From a legal perspective, it can act as a waiver to the common law tort of battery or negligence in medical research.

They are common law torts that are enforceable in state courts in the same way that a trespass or battery claim is enforced.

An individual attempting to pay a public figure to destroy the economic advantages of a competitor would be open to bribery charges and a host of common law torts for commercial interference.

In addition, a considerable number of British cases, decided in the absence of national legislation expressly enabling claims for extraterritorial human rights abuses and therefore based on principles of common-law tort, have revealed a willingness to hold corporations liable for human rights violations perpetrated abroad.

He dealt with fields of common law, including torts, contracts, and copyright, and admiralty law.

The courts have also determined that the traditional common law rules of the tort of defamation strike a proper balance between free speech and the protection of reputation, and have declined to apply a public figure doctrine or responsible journalism as additional defences to the tort.

Since the Act, now the, was premised on common law rules of the tort of defamation, the Court held that the Legislature had "clearly intended that the common law relating to defamation, as modified by the Act, should continue to apply in Singapore".

Ever since contract emerged from tort in the common law, both doctrinal and theoretical forces have sought to restore contractual obligation to its tort-based origins.

Trespass to goods is defined as "wrongful physical interference with goods that are in the possession of another", and is covered not only by the common law, but also by the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977.