Today, NIH posted a "correction" to the Red Team report's assertion that the Clinical Center has not collected common quality control measures.
Speaking after Mr. Obama called for "common sense" gun control measures at the National Urban League's conference on Wednesday, Dan Gross, the group's president, said that while the group appreciated the president's words, they were not enough.
Why do surveys show that a majority of Americans support common sense gun control measures, and yet our legislators rarely pass them?
Just like people who love their high-capacity clips and hate background checks, we who support common sense gun control measures need to act as if our lives depend on winning this war.
The most common combination of control measures used by ICUs was targeted screening, strict single-room isolation, and decolonization with mupirocin.
Not even the most heinous massacres of our youngest schoolchildren or our oldest churchgoers can convince legislators to compromise on some common-sense gun control measures, be they expanded background checks, assault weapons bans or the elimination of gun show loopholes.
Universal background checks, mental health restrictions and requirements for the use of biometric software in guns that prevents anyone but the legal owner from firing the weapon, to name a few common-sense gun control measures, could all reduce the chance of another Newtown.
So here's the real political problem: Ask people about specific, common-sense gun control measures and they strongly approve.
Some 15,700 gun-owning members of MoveOn.org, a leading national progressive organization, have started a campaign to advocate for "common-sense gun control measures," the organization announced Friday.
