In psychological research, Baumrind (1971) first proposed common classifications of parenting, namely "authoritative," "authoritarian," and "permissive".
In Project X, we differentiated the business content dimensions of human resources, finance, accounting, marketing, and organization and management, in line with common classifications of the domain of BA in the literature and at institutions of higher education in Germany (see in detail Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia et al. 2014).
There are two common classifications of kitsune.
A common classification of emotional constructs is based on the differentiation of trait and state emotions.
A common classification of such techniques considers three categories: low, intermediate, and high levels.
The most common classification of axial carpal dislocations is by Garcia-Elias et al. [14].
In this research takes advantage of continuous spatial data because in the common classification of spatial data, we will witness the loss of a significant amount of information.
The most common classification of World Englishes by US linguist Braj Kachru (1986, 1988, 1992, 2011) visualizes the spread of English around the globe in a model consisting of three concentric circles.
In the feed industry, there is a common classification of feeds into energy-rich and protein-rich feeds, whereby feed ingredients within each group could be substituted for each other at different percentages without necessarily affecting the animals being fed.
Avempace comments on his words but when he comes to "in all the syllogistic arts", he moves to another treatise of Alfarabi (Dunlop 1957b, Risâlah, Arabic, pp. 225 225, English transl. 230 231), and seizes the opportunity to expound on their common classification of the syllogistic arts.
More pertinently, there are clear functional differences between these proteins; for example, exchange of H+/Ca2+ (AtCAX1), H+/Mn2+ (AtCAX2), H+/Mg2+ (AtMHX), H+/K+ (AtCCX3), and Na+/Ca2+ (AtNCL) (Hirschi et al. 1996; Shaul et al. 1999; Pittman et al. 2004; Morris et al. 2008; Li et al. 2016), strongly argues against a common classification of these proteins as Na+/Ca2+ exchangers.
