Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
A criterion of ontological commitment is a principle that tells us when we are committed to believing in objects of a certain kind in virtue of having assented to certain sentences.
In this sentence, the expression 'the property of redness' seems to be a singular term — it seems to denote the property of redness; thus, using the above criterion of ontological commitment, if we think (R) is true, then it would seem, we are committed to believing in the property of redness.
But for those of us who were committed to believing in the essential wisdom of electorates, the idea of the country agreeing to hand itself back to the laissez-faire barbarism of the years before the war was unimaginable.
Searle and Vanderveken infer that this implies that if P logically entails Q, and an agent asserts P, then she is committed to believing that Q.
It is unclear, for instance, what it could mean to be committed to believing Q (rather than just being committed to Q) if this is not to be explicated as being committed to cultivating the belief that Q.
Gilbert takes this not to imply that the individuals involved are (or have to be) personally committed to the attitude in question, e.g., that each or any of them believes what they are jointly committed to believing as a body (cf. Gilbert 2009).
Similar(52)
According to Levi, we are doxastically committed to believe in all the logical consequences of our beliefs, but typically our performance does not live up to this commitment.
Isaac Levi (1991) has clarified the nature of this idealization by pointing out that a belief set consists of the sentences that someone is committed to believe, not those that she actually believes in.
I think when we work on these things, I get worried about committing to believing a specific thing but then I remember that you can't really be wrong when you're just throwing concepts out there.
Most importantly, commit to believing in yourself.
Commit to believing your child and putting their well-being above any one else.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com