Sentence examples for commitment to objects from inspiring English sources

Though Mr. Varnedoe allows that the show had some "very particular problems," its stated ambitions did accurately reflect the general sensibilities of its organizer: a pursuit of specifics in generalities, a commitment to objects and the people who make them, a search for connections between high art and the stuff of everyday life.

But even if we restrict our attention to ontological commitment to objects, there is no reason to think that Frege's criterion is necessary as well as sufficient.

For one thing, just as Frege took singular terms to be a vehicle for commitment to objects, he took incomplete expressions to be a vehicle of commitment to concepts and (more generally) functions.

Following Gilbert Ryle's (1931) influential criticisms of Meinong's theory of non-existent objects, the theory of descriptions has been taken as a model for avoiding ontological commitment to objects, and so logical constructions in general are often seen as being chiefly used to eliminate purported entities.

Thus, Priest belongs to those philosophers who distinguish between "quantifier commitment" and "ontological commitment" (see Azzouni 2004), claiming that to "quantifier over" objects of a certain kind does not entail an ontological commitment to objects of this kind.[2] The various logics of nonexistent objects cannot be described and discussed here in detail.

It is not uncommon to respond to indispensability arguments for the existence of objects of a certain kind by means of a paraphrase strategy, which if successful, would show how to make do without the ontological commitment to objects of the offending kind.

If both parties agree that plural expressions have semantic values, and if both agree that commitments to objects are incurred only by singular first-order terms and variables, then perhaps it does not matter whether other sorts of terms and variables should be regarded as introducing their own distinctive kinds of ontological commitment.

The deflationary nominalists not only avoid the commitment to mathematical objects, they also claim that such objects have no properties whatsoever.

Working with the museum, our interpretive role was guided by the institution's commitment to keeping objects authentic and contemporaneous, no matter how large or small: photographs, documentary films, paintings, posters, even observations and reflections.

No commitment to mathematical objects is, in principle, made.

No commitment to mathematical objects or structures seems to be needed to implement the proposed translation scheme.