Sentence examples for commitment to causal from inspiring English sources

The Stoics express their commitment to causal determinism in a potentially misleading way.

Given his commitment to causal synonymy, Aristotle needs to invoke considerations through which a chain of efficient causes of some entity can be meaningfully compared in terms of causal efficacy.

Clearly the structure of this sort of argument requires some characterization of the essence of the physical, in contrast to the mental, and Davidson's strong commitment to causal closure may have led to its invocation here, due to a lack of alternatives.

That is true of Davidson's argument for monism shorn of any commitment to causal closure: someone who espouses dualism along with the cause-law, interaction, and anomalism principles but eschews causal closure is nevertheless shown by that argument that dualism is inconsistent with her other commitments.

Health researchers should continue to expand their commitment to rigorous causal evaluation with quasi-experimental methods, and international institutions should increase their support for these efforts.

It is worth noting that this dual explananda strategy is consistent with Davidson's commitment to the causal closure of the physical domain (Crane 1995 seems to miss this point)—every physical event can have a physical explanation, even if the mental component of some physical events can be rationally explained only through appeal to mental components of the causing event.

But its commitment to casual rigor remains.

The first statement, (1′), expresses Reid's commitment to an agent causal account of human free action.

As the brief historical sketch earlier will have made clear, interactionist dualism offers a perfectly straightforward theoretical option requiring no commitment to any bizarre causal structures.

Haas provides an articulated meaning of the idea of epistemic communities as 'a network of professionals with recognized expertise and competence in a particular domain, who share a commitment to a common causal model and a common set of political values' (Haas 1992, p. 3 and Haas 1990).

Further, this commitment to the event-causal framework is sustained by a widespread dissatisfaction with alternative agent-causal and volitionist theories of agency.