Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Reviewer #4: I have no further comments to this paper.
In conclusion, the criticism of Myers et al. (2009) and Gies et al. (2009; see also comments to this paper at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/gesundheit-e/veran-staltungen/bisphenol-a/index.htm) regarding the value of the three- and two-generation studies of Tyl et al. are unsubstantiated.
Similar(58)
The reviewers, Dr. S. Nichol and Dr. S. Gallagher, gave us the useful and valuable comments to revise this paper.
GC provided comments to the paper.
"This looks like a big opportunity for fraud," Silber commented to the paper.
Lawyers for the agents declined to comment to the paper.
The bank declined comment to the paper.
NT and NY commented to the paper.
OT and MB wrote and commented to the paper.
We also would like to express our thanks to Dr. Wanapa for her close supervision and encouragement for this project and to Prof. Schelp and Thomas Carton to provide comments on this paper.
RE co-designed the study, supervised PCI, made final comments to paper.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com