Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
SG provided significant comments on revision of the paper.
Similar(59)
Comments on revisions: 1) The authors shore up their complementation data.
Additionally, many of the articles commented on "revisions," but there was inconsistency in what that entailed.
CP and TJ commented on revisions to the manuscript.
HVDB, FG, IS, and MS commented on revisions to the manuscript.
Anne-Sophie Anne-Sophie Woronoffot, Gilles Nallet, Francis Schwetterle, Laurent Cals, Samuel Limat commented on revisions to the manuscript.
MC helped shape the analysis and interpretation, commented on revisions to the manuscript.
NM contributed to the discussion to generate the manuscript, participated in drafting sections of the manuscript and commented on revisions.
RN contributed to the discussion to generate the manuscript, participated in drafting sections of the manuscript and commented on revisions.
AN contributed to the discussion to generate the manuscript, participated in drafting sections of the manuscript and commented on revisions.
All authors contributed to the scientific content of the manuscript, commented on revisions and read and approved the final version.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com