Figure 5 Boxplots of phrase command magnitude by intended tempo.
Figure 5 illustrates values of phrase command magnitude Ap by intended tempo.
Table 2 summarizes the results obtained from the model comparisons on the Fujisaki phrase level parameters, that is, phrase command magnitude Ap and phrase duration, the distance between subsequent phrase commands.
The lateral control of an autonomous guided vehicle (AGV) is highly in‡uenced both for the longitudinal speed and the position input command (magnitude of the reference signal) of the vehicle.
For phrase command magnitude Ap, comparisons between full and reduced models showed a significant difference and both full models exhibited an increased goodness of fit: between-rate variation as well as between-speaker variation was significant.
Within the framework of the Fujisaki model, Fujisaki and Hirose [6] found that phrase command magnitude Ap is lower for speakers with fast articulation rates than for speakers with a normal or slow rate.
Table 2 Summary of the statistics for the phrase-level Fujisaki model parameters Fujisaki model parameter Factor Result Phrase command magnitude Ap Intended tempo P < 0.0001, AIC = −872 Speaker P = 0.0009, AIC = −872 Intended tempo*speaker P = 0.033, AIC = −860 Phrase duration Intended tempo Not significant Speaker P = 0.023, AIC = 1,274 Intended tempo*speaker P = 0.009, AIC = 1,291.
At increased load, intermediate temperature heat release (ITHR) for the S = 0 fuel was observed several crank angles prior to spark command, and ITHR magnitude was proportional to intake temperature.
The command aims at changing the magnitude and the direction of the forces applied, namely the thrust and the aerodynamic force.
Unlike conventional approaches, the resulting control law has less maximum magnitude of the instantaneous control command and it can reduce the actuator saturation phenomenon in real physic system.
