The use of combined methods has yielded some important and interesting findings which can be used as a baseline to inform future development of a strategic framework for pan-London TB service delivery.
Examples show that networks designed using the combined method have less training and validation error than growing or pruning alone.
These combined method had great potential in application of Cu recovery from sludge.
This combined method has been used to recruit MSM study participants [ 18– 20].
Data mining and molecular or genetic markers combined method had raised potential clinical implementation in prediction of patient outcome for solid tumour.
If so, then again, their combined method has quite limited power and scope, and may show marginal improvement over simply making a list of all genes expressed at synapses.
There is a scarcity of research into the best method of barrier identification, although combining methods has been suggested to be beneficial.
Using potentially resource-intensive methods, particularly when combining methods, has implications for project costs, and subsequently the overall cost effectiveness of an intervention.
They describe all the different qualitative, semiquantitative, and combined methods that have been proposed for assessing the presence and grading of the severity of the vascular inflammation.
