Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Although self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) insertion is widely used for relief of malignant colorectal obstructions, the immediate technical and clinical failure rates of SEMSs and the associated risk factors remain largely unknown.
Similar(59)
Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are being increasingly used to solve malignant colorectal obstruction (MCRO).
Self-expandable metal stents are an alternative to preoperative and palliative colostomy for patients with malignant colorectal obstruction.
Colonoscopic insertion of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) has been widely performed for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction.
Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent placement has been used as an alternative to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction; however, factors affecting its clinical outcome are unclear.
Although self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are widely used for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction, they often become occluded by tumor ingrowth.
To prospectively evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of a newly designed self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) in the treatment of patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction.
Insertion of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) can provide rapid relief of malignant colorectal obstruction and can be used as a palliative treatment or as a bridge to surgery.
Although self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) insertion has been shown to be an effective therapy for palliation of obstruction from colorectal malignancy, the clinical efficacy of SEMS insertion in the palliation of colorectal obstruction from an extracolonic malignancy (ECM) has not been extensively evaluated.
Surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction poses several problems.
Intrinsic obstruction caused by primary or recurrent adenocarcinoma and extrinsic invasion/compression due to pelvic malignancies represent the main causes for malignant colorectal obstruction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com